21 May 2026

Britain thinks net migration is rising — when it has actually fallen by more than three-quarters

View all news

New research reveals a major gap between public perception and reality as net migration drops to lowest level in decades.

Media contact:
Steve Ballinger
07807 348988
steve@britishfuture.org

Britain is experiencing one of the sharpest falls in net migration on record — yet the vast majority of the public believes the opposite, according to new research published today.

New ONS data released today showed net migration at 171,00 for the year ending December 2025 – meaning it has halved in the last year and fallen by over three-quarters since its 2023 peak of over 900,000. It is projected to decline further to below 100,000 by the end of 2026 — levels not seen since the late 1990s (excluding the pandemic period).

But the latest findings from British Future’s annual Immigration Attitudes Tracker show that this shift has gone largely unnoticed by the public:

The research, conducted for British Future by Number Cruncher Politics, highlights a striking disconnect between reality and public understanding, with implications for the UK’s political debate and policymaking.  Two-thirds (67%) of people with sceptical views on immigration believe migration increased last year — compared with 37% of those with more liberal views. Similarly, six in ten people who want immigration reduced think numbers are still rising, and only 15% believe their preferred outcome — lower migration — will actually be achieved in the next year.

Sunder Katwala, Director of British Future, said:

“This is the lowest net migration since the Covid period yet only 1 in 6 people know the numbers fell at all last year. Half the public think net migration went up and expect it to increase again next year.

“These misperceptions are fuelled by an immigration debate that hasn’t kept pace with reality. Politicians are still rehearsing the same arguments from the record highs of three years ago. They need to take responsibility and talk about what’s happening now.

“We will still need to manage the pressures that immigration can bring, such as on housing and public services. But politics also needs to consider what lower immigration means for employers, university funding and the fiscal impacts on the public purse.”

“Government could lead this debate with an annual ‘Immigration Plan’ against which they’re held to account in parliament. That kind of accountability could take some of the heat out of our immigration debate – and keep the public better informed, too.”

The tracker study also finds that people massively overestimate the proportion of UK immigration that is for asylum, while underestimating migration for work and study:

The tracker research was published in association with the Policy Institute at Kings College London. Bobby Duffy, Director of the Policy Institute, said:

“We know misperceptions are often more a reflection of an emotional reaction than a calm consideration of the facts, particularly on highly-charged issues like immigration. The public are partly signalling that they’re still concerned about immigration. 

“But that doesn’t mean that facts don’t matter. People do update their perceptions when circumstances change, as we’ve seen through decades of tracking attitudes. But currently there is very little talk about how much immigration has decreased, and instead the public only really see a political and media focus on the risks and how it needs stricter control.  In that context, it’s easy to see why we think immigration is still running at record levels.”

Despite the sharp fall in numbers, views on reducing migration remain largely unchanged from last year’s tracker, revealing a clear division of public opinion. Some 55% of the public still want immigration reduced, while 40% would prefer it to stay the same or increase. Most people considering voting Labour, Lib Dem or Green at the next election do not support reductions, while Reform UK and Conservative supporters strongly favour reductions.

The research also finds the public split on tougher settlement citizenship rules proposed by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood. Sunder Katwala added:

“The government’s ten-year baseline wait to settle permanently isn’t what most people feel is fair – even before the restrictions that could leave some waiting 20 or 30 years for status. That may explain why Downing Street looks set to make changes to their plans.

“Politically, the settlement changes occupy the worst of all worlds for the Labour government: too harsh for most potential supporters on the centre-left, but not tough enough for half of Reform voters.”

 

You can download a copy of the Immigration Attitudes tracker report here.

British Future’s latest activity on Twitter