‘Let EU migrants stay’ say the British public, plus voices from business and politics

Posted on 3 July 2016

EU passportsThe Government and nominees to be the next Conservative Leader faced new pressure today to make a clear and unequivocal statement to reassure the 3 million EU citizens living in the UK that they would be able to stay after Brexit, and that a similar deal would be pursued to protect the status of the 1.2 million British citizens living in other EU countries.

New research from ICM for British Future finds that 84% of the British public supports letting EU migrants stay – including three-quarters (77%) of Leave voters. Among Conservatives, support for protecting the status of EU citizens in the UK and UK citizens in Europe is even higher at 85%, with 78% of UKIP supporters in agreement.

Just 16% of the public think that EU citizens should be required to leave the UK and that UK citizens in Europe should return home, with 23% of Leave voters and 15% of Conservatives agreeing.

A joint letter published in the Sunday Telegraph today, signed by politicians of different parties and from across the Leave and Remain divide, as well as business, NGO and academic voices, calls on the Government and politicians of all parties and on both sides of the referendum debate “to make a clear and unequivocal statement that EU migrants currently living in the UK are welcome here and that post-referendum changes would apply only to new migrants.”

That call is supported by prominent pro-Leave politicians including Daniel Hannan MEP, Labour’s Gisela Stuart MP and UKIP MP Douglas Carswell and Conservative Peter Lilley, alongside former Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who campaigned for Remain. They come together on this issue with the Institute of Directors, the TUC and a range of industry bodies casinoluck. The migration thinktank Migration Watch, which seeks cuts to future immigration, is also backing the call to protect EU migrants in the UK and British citizens living overseas, alongside the groups Migrant Voice and New Europeans, who report that the uncertainty is creating real and avoidable anxiety for their members who are directly affected.

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has also called for “immediate guarantees” to EU nationals in Scotland while Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron has made a similar call for a clear commitment to EU nationals in the UK, adding to the cross-party calls for the government to act.

A Change.org petition is also calling for a similarly reassuring statement from the Government and politicians of all parties.

The full text of the joint letter and its signatories is as follows:


The British public’s decision to leave the EU will bring many changes, most likely including changes to immigration and free movement rules.

There is considerable anxiety for the 3 million EU citizens who have made their homes in the UK, and the 1.2 million British citizens living in other EU countries. The Prime Minister’s post-referendum statement that there would be ‘no immediate changes’ to their status will have been less than fully reassuring.

This is also a vital concern for many British businesses and public services employing EU nationals, who do not want retrospective disruption to their existing workforce at a time of economic uncertainty. 

We would urge the Government, opposition parties and every candidate standing to be the next Conservative Party Leader and hence Prime Minister, to make a clear and unequivocal statement that EU migrants currently living in the UK are welcome here and that post-referendum changes would apply only to new migrants.

A clear, public commitment to protect the status of EU migrants was made by the official Vote Leave campaign – and it is important that is honoured.

By adopting this policy, the UK puts itself in a strong position to seek a clear reciprocal commitment from other EU members that EU citizens in the UK and UK nationals in other EU countries should be able to continue to live and work in those countries.

We believe there are principled, practical and legal reasons why this would be the only sensible and decent policy now that Britain has voted to Leave the EU. New research also shows a very strong consensus across both Remain and Leave voters in support of this approach.

It would also send a clear statement to the extreme minority, who now appear to believe they have licence to attack and harass migrants and minorities, that the British public finds their views repugnant and unwelcome in our society.


Gisela Stuart MP

Douglas Carswell MP

Yvette Cooper MP

Peter Lilley MP

Daniel Hannan MEP

Simon Walker, Director, Institute of Directors

Frances O’Grady, General Secretary, TUC

Julian David, CEO, techUK

Ian Wright CBE, Director-General, Food and Drink Federation

Professor Sir Cary Cooper, CBE, President of Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development

Peter Cheese, Chief Executive, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development

Nicola Dandridge, Chief Executive, Universities UK

Ufi Ibrahim, Chief Executive, British Hospitality Association

Carol Paris, Chief Executive, Horticultural Trades Association

Sam Bowman, Executive Director, Adam Smith Institute

Roland Smith, Fellow, Adam Smith Institute

Ryan Shorthouse, Director, Bright Blue

Sunder Katwala, Director, British Future

Tom Kibasi, Director, IPPR

Nazek Ramadan, Migrant Voice

Saira Grant, Chief Executive, JCWI

Alp Mehmet, Vice-Chair, Migration Watch

Mark Stears, New Economics Foundation

Roger Casale, New Europeans

Stephen Booth, co-Director, Open Europe

David Goodhart, Policy Exchange

Matthew Elliott, Director, Vote Leave

Toby Young, journalist

Professor Catherine Barnard, University of Cambridge

Professor Tamara Harvey, University of Sheffield

Professor Simon Hix FBA, London School of Economics and Political Science

Professor Anand Menon, Kings College, London

Professor Steve Peers, University of Essex

Jonathan Portes, Principal Research Fellow, National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Professor Jo Shaw, Edinburgh Law School




  • Comment by Adam Gac at 09:44 on 03.07.16


  • Comment by Peter Brown at 09:30 on 05.07.16

    I agree that all those migrants that have established legal residence in Britain should be allowed to stay, but NOT illegal migrants and those that are chronically unemployed, merely living on welfare handouts or convicted of serious crime whether here or in their home countries.

  • Comment by Kevin at 13:03 on 07.07.16

    This is a rather incomplete information… I have several questions:

    1. Who constitutes the “British public”?
    – Does this include people below 18 or only those who are eligible to vote?
    – Does this include only British citizens?
    – If yes how is this verified? Are those polled showing some proof?
    – If not how relevant is this research?
    – Did this research also sample the 1.2 million of Britons living outside UK (who are eligible to vote, if that is a filtering criterion)?

    2. Do you have the poll results split over England, Scotland, Wales and NI?
    – Do you have it further split over London and rest of England?

    3. How reliable do you think are the claims of those polled on whether they voted Leave or not?
    – What percentage of those polled claimed they voted Leave? Does it match the actual known percentage of Leave voters? (This of course needs to be adjusted depending on answers to questions in point 1.)
    – Did the poll also ask whether those who claimed they voted Leave have changed their mind on the EU citizen immigration since the referendum?

  • Comment by Kevin at 13:27 on 07.07.16

    One more question: how many people refused to participate? How many refused when they learned the poll was concerning the EU citizen immigration?


  • Comment by Kevin at 13:42 on 07.07.16

    The ICM poll of 4th July 2016 (https://www.icmunlimited.com/polls/)
    reveals 46% or Leave voters think the immigration needs to be tackled. How does this relate to

    “New research from ICM for British Future finds that 84% of the British public supports letting EU migrants stay – including three-quarters (77%) [sic] of Leave voters.”

    Does this mean the Leave voters are primarily concerned about the non-EU immigration?

  • Comment by Michael Elliott at 21:12 on 11.07.16

    Could you kindly send me the link to he ICM poll on attitudes to immigrants that you reference? Than k you.

  • Comment by David Simmonds at 19:28 on 21.08.16

    From ICM:

    “ICM interviewed a nationally representative sample of 2,418 GB adults aged 18+. Fieldwork was conducted online on 24-26 June 2016”

    This statement leaves too many questions for it be anything close to reliable

  • Comment by David Simmonds at 19:32 on 21.08.16

    Your funded by George Soros and the EU and expect to be taken seriously.

  • Comment by A citizen at 09:27 on 25.08.16

    Please, take off your mask once and for all, this Brexit vote only helped to show your true colours, just stop pretending and be clear on what you are:

    A racist country.

  • Comment by Ian Stabb at 13:18 on 05.09.16

    Who asked me?

    Who was asked?

    Why were they involved & not those who have a very different view?

  • Comment by KennethVef at 22:18 on 21.01.17

    белая печень у осетров что это за заболевание и как ее вылечить http://paradoxplaza.xyz/index.php?id=11519 что я смогу купить бросив пить

  • Comment by JeffreySmupt at 03:20 on 26.01.17

    future opportunities cover letter thesis for dracula free narrative essay on cultural experience

  • Comment by LeonardNix at 02:40 on 27.01.17

    fictional narrative essay
    example thesis statement death penalty
    example of a cover letter for an internal job posting
    global warming research paper outline
    example of thesis topic

  • Comment by GordonDup at 10:57 on 01.02.17

    dj stocks – Financial Stock Index, Online Stock Betting.

  • Comment by Davidslene at 15:29 on 01.02.17

    mrwhite – rescator down, cc dumps forum.

  • Comment by Thomasevera at 10:53 on 02.02.17

    изготовление брелоков на заказ – флешки из пвх, магниты на холодильник изготовление.

  • Comment by Jerrystorn at 15:59 on 03.02.17

    эвакуатор 24 часа – эвакуатор Кронштадт, техпомощь на дороге в Санкт-Петербурге.

  • Comment by Williamlag at 16:33 on 03.02.17

    техпомощь в москве – эвакуатор срочно и быстро, автоэвакуатор в москве.

  • Comment by Thomasvoise at 13:13 on 13.02.17

    деревянные лестницы производство изготовление – деревянная лестница ясень или дуб, лестница из массива ясеня.

  • Comment by Pabloutivy at 14:32 on 13.02.17

    чернозем серпухов – щебень известняковый в серпухове, грунт серпухов.

  • Comment by CharlesToora at 14:50 on 13.02.17

    серпухов песок – доставка щебня серпухов, рытье траншей серпухов.

  • Comment by Keitherrok at 16:13 on 13.02.17

    free adult pdf magazines – home design magazines, yachting magazine.

  • Comment by Jamescof at 21:57 on 02.03.17

    заменить поролон в диване – купить матрас для дивана в москве, чехлы для диванов на заказ пошив.

  • Comment by Freddienaste at 10:17 on 10.03.17

    хорош сайт табак для кальяна – табак для кальяна, табак адалия.

  • Comment by Kennethacins at 01:03 on 20.03.17

    dumps shop 2017 – cvv shop 2017, dumps track 1 2.

  • Comment by Samuelfrees at 00:04 on 07.06.17

    первосортный веб ресурс выезд нотариуса на дом метро Парк Победы – запись на прием к нотариусу, выезд нотариуса в офис метро Улица 1905 года.